About 22594894

Roving For Peace

On November 15, Teamsters Local 237 President Gregory Floyd was awarded the World Peace Prize and named “Roving Ambassador For Peace”. The prestigious award was bestowed upon him by Father Sean McManus, President and Founder of the Washington-based Irish National Caucus and Chief Judge of the World Peace Prize and Barbara Flaherty, Judge of the World Peace Prize and Chair of the Presentation Ceremony. President Floyd was cited as “the perfect exemplar and role model for the World Peace Prize.”On November 15, 2022, Teamsters Local 237 President Gregory Floyd was awarded the World Peace Prize and named “Roving Ambassador For Peace”. The prestigious award was bestowed upon him by Father Sean McManus, President and Founder of the Washington-based Irish National Caucus and Chief Judge of the World Peace Prize, and Barbara Flaherty, Judge of the World Peace Prize and Chair of the Presentation Ceremony. President Floyd was cited as “the perfect exemplar and role model for the World Peace Prize.”

 altGreg Floyd, President, Teamsters 237

 

Recently, I was awarded the World Peace Prize and named “Roving Ambassador for Peace”. This prestigious award was bestowed upon me by Father Sean McManus, President and Founder of the Washington-based Irish National Caucus. I am the first Teamster to be honored by this organization dedicated to social and labor justice. Fr. McManus said that I was “the perfect exemplar and role model for the World Peace Prize.” WOW! It was an extraordinary moment that made me think: How exactly do you “rove for peace”? That’s not so easy.

The awards ceremony was filled with noble talk on weighty issues. Father McManus spoke about their two main objectives: To assert the basic principle that peace is the fruit of justice and that working for peace means, in fact, working for social justice. And to firmly place the American labor movement in the category of those who have worked for peace — all the time, every day, year-after-year since the late 1800s. He went on to quote from several biblical scholars and members of the clergy who support the notion that working for justice is required for those with faith in God or those people simply of good will. He mentioned that Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. loved to quote the Prophet Amos, who said: “Let justice roll down like water, and righteousness like an ever-flowing stream.” Fr. McManus said that even “people of no faith and no religion—but of good will— can agree in principle with these words. All people of good will, all fair-minded people, recognize that without justice, civilized society cannot stand; fair treatment cannot stand; fair employment cannot stand; and a just and living wage cannot stand. That is how central and basic social justice is. It unites people of faith who want to do God’s work on earth —and it unites people of no faith who want to do the fair and decent thing.

Upon receiving a plaque and medal at the awards ceremony, I addressed the audience, telling them: “To receive an award inspired by the work of some of America’s greatest leaders in social and labor justice — like Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka — is humbling. They believed that labor justice and social justice are forever intertwined. You can’t have one without the other. But equality, respect, and compassion should not only be workplace goals but also everyday goals of humanity. Dr. King perhaps expressed it best when he said, “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” Dr. King also said, “Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.” How well that fits the mission of the World Peace Foundation, which is to NOT remain silent in the face of threats to justice and peace. And it is the mission of labor unions, like Teamsters Local 237, NOT to be silent either.”

 

So now that I am entrusted with a mighty title and lofty assignment, questions remain: How does one “rove for peace”? Is it something you actively look for like a missing puzzle piece? And where do you search? Is peace something you can create like a painting? Is it something you can achieve alone, or does it require collaboration? And perhaps the biggest question: Once you’ve found it, what’s the next step? Beatle John Lennon had a suggestion when he famously wrote the song verse “Give peace a chance.” The irony here, of course, is that this is now etched in stone in Central Park, where he was assassinated. Clearly, roving for peace is complicated. Perhaps the job needs to be broken-down into parts: A sort of micro/macro distinction of personal peace and world peace. Peace of mind can be derived from the satisfaction found in offering kindness and compassion to others… feeling good about yourself because you helped someone — especially someone in need. World peace is trickier, and requires a bigger operation, yet starts by voting and helping to elect people who are admirable and worthy of our trust — people who seek public office not for personal gain but instead, as Father McManus said, “people of principles who just want to do the decent thing.” Macro peace, therefore, can only be achieved by those who will lead us with an unwavering commitment to justice and fairness.

Clearly, the job of a “Roving Ambassador for Peace” is to identify people of good will, inspired by Spike Lee’s advice to “do the right thing”, and encourage them to get involved.

Ciaran MacAirt, Fr. McManus, and John Teggart. Washington, D.C. March 2011. The Irish National Caucus arranged for them to testify at a Congressional Hearing on Northern Ireland.

Nov. 21, 2024 

IRISH CONGRESSIONAL BRIEFING

Distributed to Congress by Irish National Caucus

“Ciaran MacAirt has done extraordinary work in exposing British collusion in the McGurk Bar bombing in which his grandmother Kitty Irvine was murdered. How sad he still has to counter England’s Big Lie.”—Fr. Sean McManus

Outrage as Taylor appears to query the “innocence” of McGurk’s massacre victims

Two children were among 15 civilians killed when the UVF detonated a bomb at the bar in 1971

Connla Young. Irish News. Belfast. Thursday, November 21, 2024

FORMER Stormont minister John Taylor is facing criticism after he appeared to question the innocence of 15 Catholics killed in the McGurk’s Bar atrocity.

Mr. Taylor, also known as Lord Kilclooney, made the remarks on social media platform X in recent days.

Fifteen civilians, including two children, were killed when the UVF detonated a bomb in the North Queen Street bar, in north Belfast, in December 1971.

Security forces claims that the IRA was to blame were later shown not to be true.

Mr. Taylor, who was a Stormont minister at the time of the atrocity, wrongly said it was an IRA bomb that exploded prematurely.

During an exchange on X this week the former Ulster Unionist MP again appeared to cast doubt over the innocence of the victims.

The former politician was responding to a post by an account entitled Séamus Bryson’s Attic Trapdoor that referenced the “innocent people murdered in the McGurk’s”, and also urged him to apologize for previous remarks made.

In response the Mr. Taylor said: “You claim they were innocent.”

The following day another post by the same account again referenced the “innocents of the McGurk’s atrocity” to which Mr. Taylor replied, “you clearly do not understand the word ‘innocent’.”

Mr. Taylor’s remarks came after McGurk’s Bar campaigner Sam Irvine, who lost his mother Kitty in the attack, was laid to rest last weekend.

His nephew Ciarán MacAirt was critical of Mr. Taylor’s remarks.

“John Taylor has yet to account properly for the disinformation he parroted in the aftermath of the McGurk’s Bar massacre,” he said.

“This most recent slur occurs just weeks before the 53rd anniversary of the mass murder and cover-up, and just days after the burial of another McGurk’s Bar campaigner.”

Mr. MacAirt said Mr. Taylor’s comments will hurt relatives.

“His baseless slurs will do nothing but hurt the families once again at a particularly difficult time for them,” he said.

In 2018 Mr. Taylor was criticized for claiming McGurk’s Bar was a “drinking hole for IRA sympathizers” who have run a “political campaign to place the blame on the UVF”.

A year earlier he refused to apologize when challenged online by a McGurk’s Bar relative over declaring the atrocity was an IRA ‘own goal’.

Other social media remarks have also caused controversy including his description of former taoiseach Leo Varadkar as “the Indian”, and a claim that unionists and nationalists are not political equals.

 

 

MY FIGHT GOES ON

 

November 20, 2024

IRISH CONGRESSIONAL BRIEFING

Distributed to Congress by Irish National Caucus

“Belfast Protestant Raymond McCord, Sr. keeps up his unique campaign for justice. Raymond is the first Protestant from Northern Ireland in the current phase of The Troubles to break rank and testify in Congress about British collusion in the murder of a Protestant …That takes extraordinary courage and integrity.”—Fr. Sean McManus.

Raymond McCord’s Statement

 

On Thursday, October 31,  my solicitors McIvor & Farrell issued legal papers in Belfast’s High Court on my behalf for a Public Inquiry into the murder of my son Raymond, Jr.

Due to the courts shutting down young Raymond’s inquest because of the Legacy Act of the Conservative government—and a senior judge ruling that the Legacy Act is incompatible with human rights, and the most senior judge Lady Chief Justice ruling that ICRIR also set up by the Conservatives is also incompatible with the human rights of victims—  I have nowhere else to go except to fight for a full Public Inquiry for my murdered son.

A large part of my legal argument is the fact that collusion between the British state’s Special Branch, a secret department of the Police Service of Northern Ireland,  colluded with the proscribed terrorist organization the UVF in the murder of Raymond, Jr. and the cover-up of it.

This is the inquiry the British government and its security agencies fear more than any other because the British government accepted the independent Police Ombudsman report in 2007 that there was collusion between the State Forces and the UVF in my son’s murder. Yet no one has been brought to justice.

I ask politicians and citizens in America to support me in my call for a Public Inquiry, and I take this opportunity to again thank Father Sean McManus, Barbara Flaherty, and the Irish National Caucus in Washington, D.C.,  for their fantastic support over the years for justice for young Raymond.

On November 9, my son will be dead 27 years, no inquest, no justice, no truth,  but I will not give up and on his anniversary, I ask all in America to say a prayer for justice for Raymond, Jr.

 

IRISH LANGUAGE

Banner appeared at site of planned Irish medium school at Montgomery Road

By Paul Ainsworth. The Irish News. Thursday, October 31, 2024.

A banner at the site of a planned Irish language primary school in east Belfast calling for it to be relocated to where it is “wanted” has been condemned as “repulsive.”

The banner was placed on a fence at Montgomery Road, where plans have been approved to build a new temporary building for Irish language school, Scoil na Seolta.

The school is set to open later this year but has been opposed by some in the area.

The banner – which has since been removed – stated: “Relocate Irish school to where it is needed; relocate Irish school to where it is wanted.”

Anonymous leaflets were also posted to homes in the area, asking “Do you want an Irish language school in your area?”.

In September it emerged that the Loyalist Communities Council, which represents the views of the UVF and UDA, had advised Stormont DUP education minister Paul Givan that the proposal to build the school should be scrapped during a meeting.

Alliance Party leader and East Belfast MLA Naomi Long condemned the banner’s appearance

“The level of interest in the preschool Naíscoil na Seolta is evidence that it is wanted and welcome and no one has the right to demand they move,” she said.

“It’s hard to imagine how fragile an adult’s sense of identity must be if it is threatened by bilingual toddlers playing in a sand tray or learning to count to ten.”

Alliance Lisnasharragh councilor Michael Long said: “Those behind this are not representative of people in East Belfast, who will rightly find it repulsive and I’d utterly condemn those who put it up.

“Alliance representatives have been in contact with the PSNI and have urged anyone with any information to contact them too. Children have a right to go to school without fear or intimidation.”

SDLP councilor Séamas de Faoite said:“The continued harassment of Scoil na Seolta and those behind the project is absolutely disgraceful. Let’s call this out for what it is – a group of small-minded people, who are in no way representative of the wider community, trying to stop young children from attending school.

“This is not about community concerns, it’s about bitter sectarianism and hatred.”

In a Facebook post, east Belfast loyalist activist Moore Holmes said the banner was a “clear and unambiguous message on behalf of concerned local residents.”

“This site has always been the most bizarre and inappropriate location for an Irish Language School,” he wrote.

“If the local demographic and the political sensitivities around Gaelic language wasn’t enough to sway you, then the mishandling of community engagement, the commercial and industrial nature of the site alongside the disingenuous misrepresentation of community attitudes before Belfast City Council by the organizers would be enough to do it. Relocate.”

*****

 

A PERSONAL PILGRIMAGE

By Fr. Sean McManus, President, Irish National Caucus. Capitol Hill, Washington, D.C.

The just-published 420-page book The Barn, by Wright Thompson, is about the barn in which the 14-year-old black boy Emmett Till, visiting from Chicago, was tortured and executed/ lynched in 1955 in Mississippi, and about how so much was covered up, still to this day.

Indeed, the barn itself was not generally known as the actual murder site. About 15 years ago, I made a personal pilgrimage to the sacred sites in Mississippi where the civil rights martyrs were murdered: Emmett Till, Medgar Evers, the three activists murdered in Philadelphia (MS), James Chaney, Andrew Goodman, and Michael Schwerner, so forth and so on. (And cried silently at each site, just as I do at the graves of Irish patriots who gave their lives for Irish freedom).

But I did not know about the barn and only visited the remains of the store in Money in which Emmett had allegedly whistled at the white woman whose husband owned the store. That accusation, true or false, in those days, was enough to guarantee young innocent Emmett’s murder.

Thompson says something that is very relevant to the discussion on the Legacy Act of The King-in-Parliament: “The more I looked at the story of the barn… the more I understood that the tragedy of humankind isn’t that sometimes a few depraved individuals do what the rest of us could never do. It’s that the rest of us hide those hateful things from view, never learning the lesson that hate grows stronger and more resistant when it’s pushed underground. There lies the true horror of Emmett Till’s murder… Which is why so many have fought literally and figuratively for so long to keep the reality from view.” (Page 12).

‘Pushing underground…’ That’s the story of the British Empire – the story of The-King (or Queen or Monarch)-in-Parliament… and the story of the Legacy Bill that King Charles III turned into the Legacy Act by his royal assent, which is all about protecting the crown forces and their political bosses (the king being the boss of bosses).

Because as George Orwell said: “Who controls the present, controls the past.” For 855 years – and counting – England has controlled Ireland’s present and past. And England is not going to tell the truth about what it did in Ireland or any of the countries it oppressed in its racist, genocidal empire. So, we all have to tell the truth about what England did and is still doing in Ireland.

I conclude by referring to another great book (which I made sure to mention in our constant Irish Congressional briefings): Legacy of Violence: A History of the British Empire (2022) by Harvard Professor Caroline Elkins.

How perfect is that title in the context of the Legacy Act of The King-in-Parliament. And, the book blurb on the back page, in part, irresistibly declares: “[Professor Elkins] makes clear when Britain could no longer maintain control over the violence it provoked and enacted, it retreated from the empire, destroying and hiding incriminating evidence of its policy and practices.” And, please God, that is perhaps what the deplorable Legacy Act of The King-in-Parliament also heralds: England’s final withdrawal from Northern Ireland – enabling as the Irish National Caucus internet petition calls for: ‘Ireland, too, has the right to be one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.’ This magnificent petition now has 31,661 signers, with more than 1,000,000 petition views.

To sign the petition, go to this link: www.change.org/IrelandOneNation.

Brexit, backed by the DUP against the wishes of the Northern Ireland electorate, has had a transformational impact on the campaign for Irish unity

Noel Doran. Former Editor. Irish News. Belfast. Monday, October 28, 2024.

IT is always possible to draw different conclusions from separate opinion surveys, allowing for the usual margins of error, so, when questions which do not involve a fixed schedule are involved, it is sensible to examine trends over a prolonged period.

The Good Friday Agreement, for completely valid reasons, took a vague approach in 1998 to the prospect of an Irish unity referendum, and it cannot be disputed that no consequential discussions on the subject followed for many years.

Circumstances have been changing slowly but surely and, while the timing and outcome of a border poll remains uncertain, it is clear that the wider debate is now firmly emerging.

The details of the latest initiative from the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), the Northern Ireland General Election Survey 2024, have been closely studied by those on both sides of the argument since they were first published by this newspaper last week, and while at the most basic level the data indicates that the largest group of voters still favor maintaining the status quo, it is the longer-term patterns which are hard to avoid.

It is striking that, even though some observers believe the methodology employed understates nationalist leanings, the latest ESRC findings show that support for the union has fallen below 50 per cent for the first time, sitting at 48.6 per cent, with this figure dropping by more than 10 percentage points over the last decade, and by almost five points in the last five years alone.

Backing for unity is rising at an almost identical rate, up by five points since 2019 to 33.7 per cent, and a particularly telling statistic is that under 25s who expressed a view are evenly split on the union, with exactly 47.7 per cent on each side.

Unionists who believe that nationalists are trying to extract the maximum benefit from the UK’s marginal vote to withdraw from the European Union in 2016, against the wishes of the Northern Ireland electorate, are probably right, and Brexit can be plainly seen as the biggest boost to the campaign for Irish unity in living memory.

It has had nothing less than a transformational impact, as the ESRC statistics confirm, and the evidence is that the unionist advantage which appeared to be impregnable for generations is being relentlessly eroded.

No serious commentator has suggested that unionists might be ready to switch allegiance in a border poll, even before the latest developments in both Belfast and Dublin which have significantly damaged Sinn Féin’s credibility.

However, it will be remembered that Peter Robinson, justifiably regarded as the leading unionist tactician of his era, confidently told a DUP gathering in 2013 that Catholic votes, from those he described as “culturally Irish”, would secure the union in a referendum, which he insisted would be at least half a century away in any event.

The bigger picture has altered substantially since then, after errors of judgment were made in all sections of our society, and a verdict will ultimately be delivered by nationalists, unionists and the unaligned.

Peter Robinson’s latest successor as DUP leader, Gavin Robinson, acknowledged this reality in a speech last week, and it would be fascinating to learn the specific views of both Mr. Robinsons on recent interventions from unionist figures, including some of their party colleagues, over Irish culture.

Continuing onslaughts against GAA members and Irish language enthusiasts, even those of primary school age, have been well documented, and the Assembly questions from Timothy Gaston of the Traditional Unionist Voice which emerged last week represented a new low.

Mr. Gaston, an MLA in North Antrim, demanded to know if a visit by an All-Ireland-winning GAA player to Armagh fire station, in a different constituency more than 50 miles away, was a breach of employment regulations.

The player brought along the Sam Maguire Cup while offering his gratitude to the emergency staff who attended a road traffic tragedy in which three people – two of his close relatives and a friend – were killed last year.

It was a pathetic complaint in every way, which was firmly rejected by the relevant minister, Mike Nesbitt of the Ulster Unionist Party, but it will have an influence on thinking well beyond North Antrim.

Although we need to closely examine health, education, economic, environmental and other issues before a referendum is confirmed, it is beyond doubt that the attitudes exemplified by Mr. Gaston will also be a factor.

n.doran@irishnews.com